Researchers from ETH Zurich have uncovered important safety vulnerabilities in a number of broadly used end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) cloud storage providers.
The cryptographic flaws may enable attackers to bypass encryption, compromise file confidentiality, tamper with knowledge, and even inject unauthorised recordsdata into customers’ storage.
The research analysed 5 E2EE cloud storage suppliers—Sync, pCloud, Seafile, Icedrive, and Tresorit—which collectively serve an estimated 22 million customers worldwide. Every of the providers guarantees strong encryption to safeguard recordsdata from unauthorised entry, even by the service supplier.
Nonetheless, researchers Jonas Hofmann and Kien Tuong Truong found that 4 of the 5 have extreme flaws which may weaken protections. Offered on the ACM Convention on Laptop and Communications Safety (CCS), their findings spotlight potential gaps within the E2EE safety guarantees made by suppliers.
Tresorit stands out however isn’t flawless
Of the providers examined, Tresorit demonstrated the fewest vulnerabilities, with solely minor dangers of metadata tampering and non-authentic keys throughout file sharing. Though much less extreme, these points may nonetheless pose dangers in sure situations. In distinction, the opposite 4 providers exhibited extra substantial safety gaps, rising the probabilities of knowledge publicity or tampering.
Key vulnerabilities and practical threats to E2EE
To guage the energy of E2EE safety, researchers examined ten totally different assault situations, assuming the attacker had already gained management over a cloud server with permissions to learn, modify, or inject knowledge. Although this stage of entry is unlikely, the research contends that E2EE needs to be efficient even beneath such situations. Some notable vulnerabilities are:
- Unauthenticated Key Materials: Each Sync and pCloud had been discovered to have unauthenticated encryption keys, permitting attackers to insert their very own keys, decrypt recordsdata, and entry delicate knowledge.
- Public key substitution: Sync and Tresorit had been weak to unauthorised key substitute throughout file sharing, permitting attackers to intercept or change recordsdata.
- Protocol downgrade assault: The protocols utilized by Seafile allowed for a downgrade to weaker encryption requirements, making it extra weak to brute-force assaults.
Different dangers had been recognized in Icedrive and Seafile, which used unauthenticated encryption modes, permitting attackers to change and corrupt file contents. Moreover, vulnerabilities within the “chunking” course of throughout a number of providers may compromise file integrity by permitting attackers to reorder, take away, or alter file items.
Supplier offers responses and subsequent steps
In April 2024, the researchers shared their findings with Sync, pCloud, Seafile, and Icedrive, adopted by Tresorit in September. Responses assorted, with Sync and pCloud but to reply, Seafile getting ready to patch the protocol downgrade challenge, and Icedrive declining to handle the considerations. Tresorit acknowledged receipt however declined to talk extra.
In response to a latest BleepingComputer report, Sync indicated that they’re “fast-tracking fixes” and have already resolved among the documented knowledge leak points with file-sharing hyperlinks.
ETH Zurich researchers imagine these safety flaws are widespread throughout many E2EE cloud storage platforms, underscoring the necessity for additional investigation and a standardised protocol to make sure safe encryption within the business.
(Picture by Roman)
See additionally: Why corporations proceed to wrestle with cloud visibility – and code vulnerabilities
Need to study extra about cybersecurity and the cloud from business leaders? Try Cyber Safety & Cloud Expo happening in Amsterdam, California, and London. Discover different upcoming enterprise expertise occasions and webinars powered by TechForge right here.