Backside line: Leaked benchmarks for Intel’s upcoming Core Extremely 7 155H Meteor Lake processor have arrived, bringing with them loads of curiosity. Sadly for Crew Blue, they reveal some underwhelming outcomes. Whereas the chip does show potential with its built-in graphics capabilities, features reminiscent of CPU efficiency and battery life are inflicting concern, notably when in comparison with AMD’s Ryzen 7 7840HS.
Slated for an official launch on December 14, this is not the primary time we have seen leaked particulars concerning Intel’s Core Extremely 7 155H, a part of the Meteor Lake cell collection.
The newest info comes from some pre-launch assessments performed by Bilibili person Corbcas, who revealed a combined bag of outcomes.
The 155H does shine in the case of built-in graphics, scoring 3,077 factors within the 3DMark Time Spy Graphics check, outperforming even AMD’s Radeon 780M graphics from the Ryzen 7840HS. This achievement is notable, contemplating the iGPU’s robust presence in high-end gaming handhelds. Nevertheless, the CPU efficiency tells a distinct story: the 155H’s CPU ends in Cinebench R23 are positively much less spectacular, particularly when stacked in opposition to the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
Part | Intel Core Extremely 7 155H | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
---|---|---|
3DMark Time Spy Graphics Rating | 3,077 |
2,749 |
Cinebench R23 Single-Threaded Rating |
1,483 |
~1,800 |
Cinebench R23 Multi-Threaded Rating |
12,085 |
~16,000 |
Energy Consumption | ~40 watts | ~35W |
The Intel chip’s single-threaded and multi-threaded scores fell wanting expectations, a stunning flip for a model recognized for its CPU prowess. As AMD is gearing as much as launch its Ryzen 8000G APU, this can be a important level for these trying to choose up a brand new machine quickly.
Energy consumption of the 155H, at round 40 watts in each Cinebench R23 and Time Spy assessments, is on par with its opponents, with no big leap in effectivity. In battery life assessments, together with standby, video playback, and internet looking, the 155H lagged behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which delivered considerably higher battery efficiency.
The benchmarks additionally highlighted inconsistencies within the 155H’s CPU clock speeds, which could possibly be a consider its diversified CPU efficiency. Through the Time Spy check, the chip’s clock velocity fluctuated, sometimes peaking at 4.5GHz but additionally dropping to round 3GHz. These stuttering outcomes are certain to place a velocity bump in Intel’s roadmap for its CPU collection, together with the upcoming Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake, and Panther Lake.
Whereas the GPU efficiency of the 155H is a step in the appropriate route, the CPU outcomes and battery life depart one thing to be desired. The ultimate verdict of the chip’s real-world capabilities will solely be clear after some hands-on testing. However for now, it appears the laptop computer variant of Meteor Lake CPUs is also heading in a disappointing route like its desktop cousins.